Debt Hacker · Founder and inventor, not yet launched · 2024 to now

Built for the other side of the table

For people who owe more on their credit cards than they can pay down fast

Card issuers decide how far above the prime rate to price a card, and in 2024 that markup hit a record. I invented Debt Hacker for the people paying it, who owe more on their cards than they can pay down fast, to give them a plan for this month built on their own cards, explained in plain English.

With help from Patrick Hrabos

The problem

About half

of credit card accounts in use carry a balance from month to month, at rates that average about 22 percent.

The short version

The trap

Almost 10 years

That’s how long the CFPB’s example, $2,000 on a card at 29 percent, takes to clear at the minimum, with more than $3,000 going to interest.

The plan

Your month, card by card

In the version we’ve built, not yet launched, Debt Hacker turns your own cards, bills and income into a plan for this month: AI reads the statements, you check and correct the card details it found, and the math runs in code that can be checked.

What a simulation suggested

Simulated: about 4 in 10 → 7 in 10

I had AI agents build a simulation of 3,000 households over ten years. Of those who owed $3,000 or more they couldn’t clear within a year, about 4 in 10 got out of debt on their own and about 7 in 10 with the full approach, though most of the gain came from parts still to be built.

Late at night, card in hand

It’s late, there’s a card in your hand, and the math in your head goes like this: you paid every card last month, and the balances barely moved. Each statement tells you how long that one card will take at the minimum. None of them tells you which of your five cards should get the next dollar, or that most of the minimum you just paid went to interest.

That’s where a lot of people live. About half of card accounts in use carry a balance from month to month, at rates that average about 22 percent. The CFPB’s own example is a $2,000 balance at 29 percent: paid at the minimum, it takes almost ten years and more than $3,000 in interest to clear.

What it does to people

Research links that kind of debt to higher stress, more depression and worse health, and the link is strongest for short-term debt like credit cards, with little sign of it for mortgages. Shame makes it worse, because people who expect to be judged hide their debt and put off getting help, and that makes it harder to pay down.

I’ve watched what years of that cycle do to people’s lives, and I’ve had hard stretches of my own as a founder. That’s what started Debt Hacker: the belief that there’s a better way to look at debt than the one people are usually handed.

Where the usual advice falls short

There’s plenty of advice, from paying the smallest balance first or the highest rate first to cutting up the cards, budgeting every dollar or simply spending less. Each of those gets something right, and none of them told me what I needed: where this month’s money should go, card by card, through good months and lean ones, and how to keep the progress from leaking away.

The usual advice

Each gets something right

  • Pay the smallest balance first
  • Pay the highest rate first
  • Cut up the cards
  • Budget every dollar
  • Spend less

What I needed

A plan for my actual month

  • Where this month’s money should go, card by card
  • A plan that holds through good months and lean ones
  • A way to keep the progress from leaking away

Who the math works for

At the biggest issuers in 2022, people who carried a balance paid 94 percent of the interest and fees, while people who paid in full collected 73 percent of the rewards. Whatever got someone into debt, I wanted them to have the kind of math the lender already has. So I went looking for the holes in the system, starting with which card a regular bill goes on and when a payment lands compared with when charges post.

At the biggest card issuers, 2022

Interest and fees

94% paid by people who carry a balance

Rewards

27% to people who carry a balance

73% to people who pay in full

Source: CFPB, on the largest credit card issuers in 2022.
Hand-drawn notebook diagram in three steps. Step 1: a bar labeled "$150 minimum payment" splits into "$90 interest: gone" and "$60 principal", and an arrow carries the principal into an 18% card. Step 2: on the 18% card, an empty box labeled "$60 room freed", with an envelope labeled "$60 bill" dropping into it. Step 3: a jar labeled "checking", with a crossed-out arrow to the bill and a bold arrow labeled "$60 to 27% card instead" pointing to an orange 27% card.

In round numbers, a $6,000 balance at 18 percent has a $150 minimum (1 percent of the balance plus interest): $90 of interest and $60 of principal, which frees $60 of room on the card. Once that payment posts, put a $60 bill there instead of paying it from checking, and send the $60 from checking to the 27 percent card. Your total debt ends the month where it would have anyway, but $60 of it now costs 18 percent instead of 27: about 45 cents saved the first month, growing as the move repeats. Use a bill that charges no fee for paying by card.

Hand-drawn notebook diagram: an envelope labeled "$80 phone bill" tries an 18% card whose box is labeled "$60 room" and gets an X, then lands on a 21% card whose box is labeled "$80 room" and gets a check mark. A tag on the 21% card reads "carries a balance: interest starts now". Underneath: "cheapest card it fits on".

Each card’s room is the principal its last minimum payment paid off, so a bill that fits leaves that card’s balance where it started. Cards are tried from the lowest rate up, and a bill goes on the first card with room for all of it, never split. The $80 phone bill doesn’t fit the 18 percent card’s $60, so it goes on the 21 percent card. Like every card with room, it carries a balance, so there’s no grace period, and the bill starts costing 21 percent right away.

Hand-drawn notebook timeline of one month: on payday a bold arrow carries cash from a jar labeled "cushion stays in checking" to an orange 27% card, labeled "payday: cash to 27% card". Two thirds of the way along, an envelope with a light bulb goes on an 18% card, labeled "bill goes on 18% card". The days from payday to the bill are shaded yellow and labeled "less 27% interest these days".

Compared with sending the bill’s cash to the 27 percent card when the bill posts, sending it on payday means fewer days of 27 percent interest. Either way the bill goes on the cheapest card it fits on and costs that card’s rate from the day it posts. The saving is small, and it only works when your income covers your bills, you keep a cushion in checking, and you hold back the cash for every card’s minimum payment and for any bill a card can’t take, like rent.

What we’ve built so far

I worked out the method in a spreadsheet in 2024 and used it for months. In early 2025 I built a working first model in about three weeks, with AI writing most of the code. With help from Patrick Hrabos, it has grown into an engine that turns a person’s cards, bills and income into one plan for the month. In the version that’s built and not yet launched, AI reads your statements, and you check and correct the card details it found before anything is calculated. The plan itself is calculated in plain code that can be checked, and AI reads the paperwork and helps explain the plan.

If more money goes out each month than comes in, it refuses to make a plan and says so. It doesn’t ask for a bank login.

How a plan gets made, in the version we’ve built

  1. Your statements
  2. AI reads them
  3. You check the card details
  4. Code that can be checked does the math
  5. One plan for this month

If more goes out each month than comes in, it refuses to make a plan and says so.

What the simulation changed

To test whether my approach would work for people, I had AI agents research published US data and build a simulation of three thousand households over ten years, with some inputs still assumptions to replace. For the households carrying $3,000 or more that they couldn’t pay off within a year, the full approach raised the share who got out of debt from about four in ten to about seven in ten, and most of that gain came from parts I haven’t built yet.

Choosing between payoff orders made almost no difference. Having a plan for which card gets the extra money helped, but in interest saved it was worth less than half as much as guarding against re-borrowing, which the model assumed would cut it in half. Cashflow reclamation, the foundation of Debt Hacker’s plan, saved little on average and stretched the payoff a little, but for about 15 percent of those households it saved more interest than anything else in the approach, a median of about $3,600.

In the simulation, what mattered most was whether people kept going and whether new spending undid their extra payments. Research found that people using a debt app cut their debt by only 25 to 30 cents for each dollar they planned to pay down: most made their payments, but new spending usually offset them, and I built that into the model. Those results point toward guarding against re-borrowing, staying with people month to month, helping people ask for a lower rate, and a community of people working through the same thing. In one field experiment, people who feared being judged felt better after a debt course taken with others than after the same course taken privately online, and the connections they made there kept them motivated to pay down debt. All of these numbers stay provisional until real people use Debt Hacker.

In a simulation, who got out of debt

On their own about 4 in 10

With the full approach, mostly not built yet about 7 in 10

Simulated households carrying $3,000 or more they couldn’t pay off within a year, over ten years, in a simulation of 3,000 households that AI agents built, mostly from published US data. Most of the gain came from parts not built yet, and the numbers stay provisional until real people use Debt Hacker.

What published research found

25 to 30¢

of each dollar people planned to pay down actually came off their debt

In one study of debt-app users, most made their payments, but new spending usually offset them. The simulation used this finding as an input.

Where it is now

Debt Hacker isn’t available yet. I’m starting to talk about it openly now, and it will evolve with what I learn. It brings together what I’ve learned about how cards work, a monthly plan, AI help with the paperwork and, as it grows, people in your corner when the next swipe comes. You can follow it, and tell me what’s been hardest, at debthacker.app.

Where it’s been and where it’s going

  • 2024 The method, worked out in a spreadsheet
  • Early 2025 A working first model, built in about three weeks
  • Since then An engine that turns cards, bills and income into one plan, with help from Patrick Hrabos
  • Now Built, not launched. Tested in a 3,000-household simulation that AI agents built
  • Next What the simulation points to: guarding against re-borrowing, staying with people month to month, and a community

Next story

Comfort in wild country

Lost Horizon · Founder · 2021 to now

Read the Lost Horizon story